« August 2007 | Main | October 2007 »
September 30, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
OK - it has been trading in the $1 range since Wednesday and I think it is safe to say, you can remove it from your radar screen. I don't know about you, but I'm tired of all the posts I've made for the past two years on them even though they were some of my best. I'd list them all out here, but that seems like a waste so for the full posts hit this link. However, my first post What The Vonage was one of my favorites.
Just as their stock started trading on the $1 range they started a blog banner buy which is
very funny and a little interesting. Very funny because their ads are running on my blog right now (see screen shot), but what makes it interesting is if this is a last ditch effort to keep their once mighty ad spending going or are they trying to reach out to some influential bloggers. Usually when I advertise on blogs its because it is either a) cheap or b) I'm targeting a certain group of readers and bloggers.
Well good luck to some of my former AT&T comrades that are working there now. It is a real shame the executives mismanaged this company; it could have been a great place to work in NJ. Oh speaking of NJ, I'm off to Springsteen's rehearsal show at Continental Arena.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 28, 2007 in Online Marketing, telecommunications | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: online advertising, pardonmyfrench, telecommunications, vonage
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 28, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I got really fired up when I read this article in this weekend's Star Ledger that the State (of NJ is) launching new and different tourism campaign . According to the article NJ is wasting $650K in television ads in Boston, Richmond, NY, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Philadelphia, and Baltimore to promote vacationing in NJ. The creative sounds interesting though, but what is a complete and utter waste of tax dollars and shows how out of touch NJ's advertisers are, is that the $650K won't make a dent on TV in those MSAs. They should have spent the entire $650K on the internet. So, without further ado, top 5 things that NJ should have done with that $650K instead of wasting on a low GRP TV campaign.
HOW THE STATE OF NJ SHOULD SPEND $650k TO PROMOTE TOURISM
Well that's it. The list above is a way better use of $650K than the same old tired TV ads.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 27, 2007 in Old School Facelift | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: nancy byrne, nj, nj division of travel and tourism, pardonmyfrench
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 27, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I've written a lot in the past of understanding what your writer's rationale is for reporting news or writing posts. I always think it is important to have their frame of reference in mind because it explains a lot of what they are reporting and how they are reporting it.
First question you should always ask yourself is why are they making news? Is it to make money for their corporate masters or for some other purpose? I really believe no matter what your political leanings are - ALL OF YOUR NEWS IS SLANTED even if it is just slanted to make more money. If you don't understand that you are living in the 1950s. Take this small but humorous example from this morning's Sports Page on The Newark Star Ledger.
Back at the end of June, Dan Graziano wrote an article that said the Yankees were finished and wouldn't make the playoffs. It really pissed me off for the reason that it was way too early to write my Yankees off. That article so upset me that I basically started to ignore his ramblings, but I did believe he was entitled to his own opinion. That is until he wrote his poor explanation for it in the article called Eating My Words. See below as today's exhibit as to why News "reporters" should NOT be trusted anymore to report clean stories and all they care about is making money for their Corporation:
"So when former deputy business editor Kevin Shinkle (who's still getting used to this whole sports thing) had come to me a couple of days earlier suggesting we do a column saying, "It's Over. What's Next?" I'd protested only briefly. I wrote them off in 2005, I said, and I swore I'd never do it again. But Shinkle said it would be fun, and I agreed. This is sports, after all, and it's supposed to be fun. Besides, they were done. No way were they coming back. Not this time. Not from this."
"we got cute. Dredged up a year-old trade deadline quote from Brian Cashman about how he'd always wondered what it would be like to be a seller at the deadline, and wrote, "Well, Brian, now's your chance." Went through the whole roster, basically, and took a look at what the Yankees could get for their various players if they decided to deal them and build for the future. Splashed it on the front page of the sports section under a brilliant, over-the-top Mike Scott cartoon of a guy in a Yankees uniform lying face-down on the ground, holding a white flag, with a giant fork sticking out of his back. It was fun."
Look at the words he used. We got cute, it was fun, dredged up a year-old quote. Does that sound like unbiased reporting to you? It was all about selling newspapers that's it (period). To me it doesn't even look like it was based on his real opinion (I said, and I swore I'd never do it again. But Shinkle said it would be fun, and I agreed).
To me this is a great example of why you need multiple sources of information. You need to form your own opinion by getting as much information you can on a subject that matters to you. Think about how many more headlines and stories you have read that were just written to have some fun with you or just written to get you to buy a paper or tune into a TV show. Do yourself a favor and be an informed reader. Otherwise, you'll just end up a $1 poorer and less informed than you were before you read some news.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 26, 2007 in Advertising | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: dan graziano, pardonmyfrench, star ledger
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 26, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Sorry about the infrequent posts, but I got home very late last night when I had dinner with my Google team at Buddakan in New York and then had to pound through 200+ emails. Anyway, I had a great time at OMMA in NYC and it was a blast to see a lot of my internet Oldtimers friends; one of my best quotes was when someone said to me "I love all your posts!" So, what did I learn at OMMA this year?
All and all I really had a great time at OMMA 2007 and learned a few things in the process. For the first time in a number of years, I actually wanted to walk the vendor floor and see what was new.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 25, 2007 in Online Marketing | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: adecn, google, omma, online marketing, pardonmyfrench, rightmedia
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 22, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 20, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (1)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I saw this Fortune article called As Facebook Takes Off, MySpace Strikes Back and I really had to smile. I think it shows a lack of understanding to compare MySpace with Facebook, but before I rant a little bit lets take a look at some of the pluses that MySpace has according to the article:
Seriously, that's the pluses according to the article and those traffic numbers
are formidable but I personally think that's their downfall. There is no common thread between these pages and the best way to describe MySpace is a loose confederation of pages joined together. I mean just compare the two designs for individuals. Facebook has standard layouts that you can add applications to, but at the end of the day, the designs are Facebook's. Meanwhile MySpace while allowing you to make your own personalized page looks like 42nd st of my youth - just a series of blinking lights and porn. You can friend anyone or anything and the ONLY requests I ever get are from scantily clad women with names like Bambi and Candi. I get a few Facebook requests per day and they are all legitimate.
The only part of the article that resonated with me is that MySpace is cashing in on blog bling, but then you have to question how long that will last. I spend 10+ hours per day on the internet and I NEVER RUN ACROSS A SINGLE MYSPACE PAGE. I have plenty of Google Alerts setup and never find anything from those pages. If they are cashing in on blogs then when was the last time you saw a blog post from them? Seriously where are these blog pages?
That's why I believe that MySpace is just a Web 2.0 version of GeoCities. Back in its day, GeoCities was the 5th most trafficked site on the internet. Users had their own pages with plenty of bling and were part of neighborhoods. These pages allowed them to express themselves and of course had music and pictures, but there was no consistency even within a neighborhood. They added advertising, went IPO and then was purchased by Yahoo for $3.5 billion. Now it is the equivalent of an internet junkyard and the last time I ever saw a page I caught a virus because of a behind the scenes drive by download.
I still have no use for MySpace. Not that I'm so mature (which I am definitely not), but the lack of control makes the pages look like 42nd street - just a bunch of blinking lights and porn. The folks at Fox are going to monetize the traffic and in the short term have it churn out money. Music, dating sites, movies, and entertainment will spend money to have their ads show up on those sites, but the end of the day, it will be GeoCities part 2. Mark it down.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 19, 2007 in MySpace | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: facebook, geocities, myspace, pardonmyfrench
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 19, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 18, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Newt Gingrich just announced a Second Life event on September 27th over at the SL Capitol and this coincides with the Solutions Event also occurring that day. It will be awesome and a great use of Second Life instead of the same old tired "let's build an island that nobody comes to" event.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
****Washington Post picks up on the story and nails it exactly as to the significance of the event occurring on the steps of the Second Life Capitol. See this post.
September 18, 2007 in Politics, SecondLife | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: newt gingrich, pardonmyfrench, second life
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
About a year ago, I wrote one of my best posts ever called Online Ads I Love and Hate and then followed that post up with LowerMyBill Ads - The Worst Ads Ever, so I always have a spot in my blogging heart when I can pile on them. Kind of like Vonage and the new, new, new AT&T. So not only does Lowermybills.com have the worst online ads of all time, the longer this housing crisis drags on them more insensitive their ads become. Its not bad enough that companies like them have helped fuel the unhealthy exuberance in the housing market, but when other financial companies have the good sense to pull back a tad, these marketing simpletons keep plowing away with their cheap rates message.
Will interest rates drop? Well if you read the WSJ, many analysts expect the Fed to do
something to ease the credit crunch. Are housing prices dropping? I think in certain areas the answer is yes and according to this article, builders are marking homes down in NJ by hundreds of thousands of dollars. So because of the defaulting sub-prime mortgages that were repackaged as mortgage backed securities, you have housing prices going backwards and more Americans losing their homes or are unable to continue to get loans. This makes for a tough real estate market.
The geniuses at Lowermybills.com keep pushing the same types of messages like house payments fall again or maybe you are paying more than your neighbor. Are these payments going down because of interest rates or mortgage gimmicks? Who can waste their time to figure this out and I sure hope you don't. Look if you are running a major acquisition campaign like these guys are probably doing, then you know exactly which ads you are running and how they are doing. It just seems like somebody there ought to step back and take a look at the macro picture to see if there is a better way to message rather than continue to go after the same types of folks that are probably feeling the housing crunch more than anyone else. It is time for Lowermybills.com to lower their tone a bit and take the time to retool this ugly campaign...
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 17, 2007 in Financial Services Marketing, Online Marketing | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: lowermybills, lowermybills.com, online advertising, pardonmyfrench
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 17, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I actually had another Old School Facelift ready to go today, but while sitting through a miserable Giants-Packers Game in which I almost got into a fight, they introduced former Giants Defensive Lineman George Martin at halftime. George Martin is going to walk from The George Washington Bridge in NYC to The Golden Gate Bridge in SF to raise $10 million to support the heroes of 9-11 who worked at Ground Zero and now have health issues. Well I visited the website and without critiquing the site (which wouldn't be fair), I'd like to give them a little Old School Facelift to George Martin's Journey, especially to someone who gave me one of my favorite Giants memories when he picked off John Elway and ran back a touchdown.
Five Ideas To Make George Martin's Journey for 9-11 Better Online
Martin's journey needs to stay on people's mind in order to continue to generate the donations they are looking for. Sure, as he leaves the New York area and approaches the West Coast area there will be plenty of buzz, but on his long journey he'll need to keep generating posts, articles, and news in order to keep the money coming in. The list above is just a small listing of what can be done very cost effectively and sometimes for no cost at all.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 16, 2007 in Old School Facelift | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: a journey for 9-11, george martin, pardonmyfrench
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 14, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
In yesterday's WSJ in the Heard on the Street column they reviewed Yahoo's plan or as they wrote "lack of major overhaul" and then one of my favorite bloggers and must reads, Kara Swisher echoed the statements but filled in some more blanks with her post called Day 56: Yahoo's Sacred Cows Are Spared.
You can read both articles and as you know as a long time reader, I try not to regurgitate other posts just to get a little traffic. However, basically they both wrote about potential Google or MSN/Yahoo combinations and what Yahoo isn't doing to appease investors. Me? I won't argue with those assessments because I too think they should combine with MSN on the search business to compete with Google. However, I do think their recent acquisitions of BlueLithium and RightMedia offer more insight into what Yahoo's plans are for the future. Before I dive into my plan, lets look at a few data points...
ability but more about expanding their reach beyond Yahoo properties.So what's a Yahoo to do? Buy a social network like Facebook for a few billions or a less desirable social network? Probably not. They already have Flickr and Yahoo 360/Groups which doesn't really help them monetize traffic. My guess is for Yahoo to continue to expand their non-Yahoo inventory and use RightMedia to build an auction process around the inventory. The more sites they can add outside of Yahoo the bigger and badder (in a good way) they get. Couple that with their Google-size database of web surfing behaviors and a better buying models for advertisers, they can put the tools in place that can combat Google.
Sure if Yahoo combined with MSN they might be able to compete with Google on the search side, but that is only a minor skirmish to Google. Google is going after a much bigger share of your ad dollars in the form of video ads, display ads on their huge network, radio, print, TV; you get the idea. Yahoo needs to compete with Google for the future of your ad dollars and that future is a lot bigger than search results ads.
Think of Yahoo as a huge advertising network and the tools it needs to compete on that for a larger share of your advertising dollars. TV dollars, behavioral targeting, and bigger networks; that's what it is building.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 12, 2007 in Google, Yahoo | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: google, online advertising, pardonmyfrench, yahoo
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 11, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
***This is a repost from last year. I received a lot of good feedback, so I reposted it***
I thought my post from the other day would be enough for me, but with my kids asking questions while we are watching the football game I feel like making a post. Instead of the normal paragraph form, I'm just going to list out random thoughts that I'm having...
ront of the PathPardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 11, 2007 in The Family and Me | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: 9-11, pardonmyfrench, september 11
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Nike Football ad running all weekend long is absolutely brilliant. It is the first ad in a while that not only passed my TiVo test, but I actually saved it and replied it again for the family. It is so entertaining, the kids wanted to know if they owned Nike shoes (which they don't) and if Mary and I did (we do). That's good marketing and good conversational marketing. I'm happy to join other bloggers who think this is a brilliant ad.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 10, 2007 in Advertising | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: advertising, nfl, nike, pardonmyfrench
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I saw this article in the LA Times called AT&T Changes Cell Ad Mantra and I had to laugh while kicking myself at the same time. The article writes this in case you don't want to signup for the free subscription:
AT&T's boast was about "fewest dropped calls" -- until recently. Now, it's about "more bars in more places."Why did AT&T ditch its long-running advertising campaign? A spokesman for the wireless unit of AT&T Inc. said it was due to a decision to focus on coverage, "because this is what our customers tell us over and over again is important to them." Ira Spiro, a West Los Angeles lawyer representing an AT&T customer in a federal lawsuit against the company, called that explanation "folderol."The hostilities over fewest dropped calls -- which sent AT&T and Sprint to court last year -- continue.
OK, so why did I kick myself? Well when they first started to promote "fewest dropped calls" I tried looking for the survey that they were backing the claim up with, but couldn't get access to it. After hours of searching, I finally came close to an AT&T press release and gave up when I couldn't find the actual study. I also trashed my post which was basically going to say "see how the new, new AT&T plays around with data" because I couldn't back that claim up. Now obviously the LA Times has better resources and was able to put out the post I couldn't.
OK, so why did I laugh? Of course I never believed that claim. I personally (on the
marketing side) led the marketing of AT&T's first direct mail (and OTM) campaign promoting their wireless service during the project code named Cheetah and as you can see from my Why AT&T/iPhone Won't Live Up to The Hype post, I thought AT&T's biggest problem was their shaky network. All you new iPhone/AT&T users see what I mean by shaky network; that's why I didn't buy the iPhone and won't until Verizon comes out with a clone or the iPhone somehow ends up on that network.
Since I was on that AT&T wireless bundling team from 1995 - 2000 or so, I had an AT&T Wireless phone, but dropped it when I was traveling back and forth to Jersey City while with Harrisdirect. AT&T's less than stellar network kept dropping my calls on Route 78 in Newark. I've been using Verizon ever since and will not switch until their network has trouble...Wireless service is about the network, phones come and go.
So what else is funny? How some lawyer at AT&T probably got suckered by the marketing team into allowing these ads. I of course know nothing on how the new, new, AT&T works, but back in the Long Distance wars of the 90s the lawyers took claims very seriously and you couldn't run an ad like this without supporting documentation that would stand up in court. Plus, as I recall the old and better AT&T had an arbitration agreement with MCI and Sprint to defend claims without going to court.
Surprised that the claim isn't running anymore? You shouldn't be especially if you bought an iPhone and are not stuck with AT&T's network and sub-par customer service.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 10, 2007 in telecommunications | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: advertising, at&t, iphone, pardonmyfrench, telcommunications, verizon
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 10, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Nielsen Net Ratings published a report that looks at the Presidential candidate's online activities; you can find the report on this link. MediaPost had a nice summary and focused mostly on online website visits, but yours truly was more interested in the online advertising activity. And guess what? John McCain's online advertising is still the biggest and the best out there.
According to Nielsen's report, we were the only ones that ran any display advertising in July,
but I find that a little odd since I've seen ads for at least one other candidate. What I love even more is that we are leading all candidates by almost twice as much in search activity as the next guy proving once again that we have mastered Google and that we rely on our search campaigns to get the word out on John McCain and where he stands on issues. I wonder why more campaigns don't use search and instead continue to pour money into TV, print, and DM when search is so much more relevant, more cost effective, and quantifiable. Oh well.
BTW - as you can see from the table, McCain's nearest search competitor had decent impressions in July, but as I wrote the other day, I can not find any Romney search ads any more. So if you assume the July numbers are reasonably accurate, that's a huge falloff in impressions. My guess is that they either cut back their spending and max out early in the day or they have some new retooled strategy that minimizes online advertising. Strange.....
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 07, 2007 in Online Marketing, Politics, Search Marketing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: john mccain, online advertising, pardonmyfrench, political advertising
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 06, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Yesterday Yahoo announced that they are acquiring the 5th largest ad network BlueLithium and of course a lot of the press are digging in deep about what this means for their behavioral targeting ad buys. Reuters reported that Yahoo buys behavioral ad firm for $300 million and then one of my favorite news/bloggers Kara Swisher reported Day 50: Yahoo takes a $300 million little blue pill that could make consumers even more paranoid. Reuters wrote in that article, "bolsters Yahoo's existing behavioral ad-targeting efforts with its 250 million-strong base of Yahoo Mail users and Yahoo Travel, an analyst said. And, "This really gives us the ability to (deliver) more relevant advertising to consumers not only on the Yahoo network but also off the network," Todd Teresi, senior vice president of the Yahoo Publisher Network, said in a phone interview."
Me? Sure the behavioral targeting will happen, but I've always believed Yahoo knows more about your web surfing behavioral than anyone and that includes Google (maybe that won't be the case going forward, but hold that thought). Yahoo has been tracking your web surfing behavioral for as long as I've been working with them (1998) and I've used them to build responder and cloning models. They really don't need anyone's help with modeling and targeting, but they do need help with more traffic. Allow me to explain what I mean by that using Google as the example.
The reason Google may have better behavioral targeting in the future (ignoring whether they are hiring smarter people which I have no insider information on) is because the majority of searches occur on Google. They then provide you with all sorts of free goodies like Gmail, spreadsheets, homepage, YouTube, gadgets, maps, etc and etc so that you spend more time on their products allowing them to mine your data. So, what does Google do with that data? Well besides potentially giving you more personalized search, they use your behavioral data to improve their targeting of ads while you are surfing on their content network. You get it right? Tons of traffic, more of your valuable time, translates into better data on your behavior and that allows Google to target better ads. Now, lets look at Google's content network.
Back in the day, I wouldn't have turned content on in fact I would have stressed to you to turn it off. That's where I found click fraud data, lower conversions, and unless you used a bid manager you had no visibility where those clicks were coming from. Not any more. Google has added a lot of tools and visibility so that content can work and that means Yahoo has a problem.
Yahoo's model in the past has been search ads as well display ads on Yahoo's properties; sure Yahoo has a text ad content business but with no visibility. Google has now moved to be the largest search ad channel bundled with huge reach (80%?) on their content network. And, as opposed to Yahoo's current model the rates can be as low as your CPC or CPA rate you want to pay. Yahoo's display model is based on CPMs and on their properties, only.
That's is until the BlueLithium purchase. Now Yahoo can start to compete more with Google on the content side of the business and if you add in their past purchase of RightMedia you can see the pieces of the puzzle being put together. It isn't about getting better at behavioral targeting, it is about extending Yahoo's reach beyond their core properties.
If I had to make a bet, I'd think that Yahoo isn't done yet with buying more networks. I think they can out maneuver Google by getting even bigger on the display side of the business and that more than makes up for their shortfall on search traffic. Yahoo needs to get even bigger now...
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 05, 2007 in Online Marketing, Search Marketing, Yahoo | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: google, online advertising, pardonmyfrench, yahoo
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I know I have been pretty blunt about people doing a few searches and then drawing conclusions about an advertising spend, but I seriously haven't seen any Mitt Romney search ads in quite a long time. Perhaps they cut back on their spend and are now hitting a maximum budget early in the morning or the reverse which is they can't spend enough while people hit their search results. Maybe they are revamping their campaign and taking a pause, but it seems very odd to me. It isn't like they don't have the money since he loans his campaign money from his treasure chest. Anyone else notice this?
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 05, 2007 in Politics, Search Marketing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: google, pardonmyfrench, politics, romney, search advertising
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 05, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I decided to start a new category this weekend while I was down the shore (that's at the Jersey Beaches for you non-Jersey readers). It's called Old School Facelift and what I'll do is point out everyday occurrences that I think could use a new media strategy to boost sales. Basically, offering free advice to any local or national business when the mood strikes me. So, what hit me this weekend? The family and I attended the Cole Brothers Circus.
Yes a circus and the traveling kind when they come to your town and put down a big tent.
Not the sad shell of a circus which is now Ringling Brothers which probably makes Barnum and Bailey flip over in their graves. The Cole Brothers Circus was an absolute low tech blast . There were motorcyclists in a giant cage, clowns, a family on the trapeze, horse shows, juggling, elephants (complete with the always popular jumbo excrement), and a woman shot out of a cannon. Seriously, it was a great, great show and I highly recommend it. The only problem with it was that the big tent was about half full.
Yes. Half full, but before you laugh and think I'm crazy, trust me when I tell you that everyone, old and young, left with smiles on their faces. It really was great and when I compared it with the Ringling Brothers show we saw two years back at a giant sports arena, the Cole Brothers Circus had nobody sleeping; unlike the Ringling Brothers show which was a giant snooze festival. So, I got to thinking how can The Cole Brothers Circus increase attendance when they pull into your town?
FIVE GUARANTEED IDEAS TO INCREASE ATTENDANCE AT THE CIRCUS
That's it for now. I'm sure the top 5 mentioned above will be repeated as I put more posts on the subject. If you get the chance, go to The Cole Brothers Circus; it really is a great, low tech event to be experienced by all.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 04, 2007 in Old School Facelift | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: old school facelift, online advertising, pardonmyfrench, the circus, the cole brothers circus
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 04, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
I saw this article over at AdAge called The $1,000 An Hour Advertising Executive or How We Catch Up with Lawyers and I found it very thought provoking. However, before I dive into that let me get something out of the way first; a good lawyer can charge that amount because the downside to not paying for the best lawyer you can is that you go to jail. There I said it. Let's move on.
Marc gives some ideas how to start moving towards higher fees and I list them below, edited by me to save some space (you can read it all yourself). Marc's ideas are:
Now I've been on both sides of the aisle after spending 15 years in corporate America and now the last 2 years on the agency/consulting side so I think I have an interesting perspective. I've run my own agency selection processes, managed very large and very small agencies, both interactive and offline, and had multi-million dollar agency budgets in a year. Generally speaking, I've had great agency relationships except for one that blew up towards the end due to an inappropriate email received by yours truly from a former account executive. So, let's take Marc's ideas from the top from a client perspective.
Now, I won't go item by item from the agency/consulting side. However, I do think there are a few critical items that all agencies should do in order to charge more and/or get more money from clients.
Anyway, I have a few more ideas but the post is long enough. I think for the most part the large agency has shot themselves in the foot. Its not that there aren't good ideas at large agencies or smart media folks, its just that there is too much overhead and too much pressure to view clients as mindless revenue generating (to the firm) drones rather than what clients really are - smart people that came to you for your opinion or to fill valuable slots with your expertise.
PardonMyFrench,
Eric
September 02, 2007 in Advertising | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: adage, advertising, advertising age, agencies, pardonmyfrench
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
September 02, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog
(0)
| | Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Copyright 2005-09 by Eric Frenchman LLC. All content on Pardonmyfrench.net, pardonmyfrench.typepad.com and EricFrenchman.com, including text, graphics, logos, and images, and the selection and arrangement thereof, is the exclusive property of Eric Frenchman LLC or its licensors and is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. All trademarks appearing on Pardonmyfrench.net, pardonmyfrench.typed.com, and ericfrenchman.com are the property of their respective owners. All articles posted are intended for the personal, non-commercial use of Pardonmyfrench.net, pardonmyfrench.typed.com, and ericfrenchman.com visitors, provided, however, that all copyright and other proprietary notices displayed with such articles are fully retained. All rights not expressly granted are reserved.


